|
michel piccoli (born 1925)
frank capra |
piccoli
"There is a marvellous note of the gloomy
connoisseur in Piccoli."
Michel Piccoli autographs, dvds, photographs, dvds and more @ ebay.com (direct link to signed items)
There is a certain irony, that Michel Piccoli
would probably relish, in the fact that the films
for which he is best known and most valued in
England and America are those for which he
was most reviled in France.
Born in Paris in 1925, Piccoli was on the
stage for ten years before taking to the movies
in the mid-Forties. In a working career spanning well over 50 years
he has made something like three films a year.
Yet, due to the vagaries of film distribution,
the dozen or so that have been seen outside France
are mostly those he
made during the late Sixties and early
Seventies.
This was, of course, the time of les evenements of 1968, when everyone in Paris - even
actors - nailed their colours to the mast.
Picolli's French audiences were surprised and
then outraged at the sight of the man who had
previously encapsulated all that they revered
in suave, slightly foreign charm (he had played Don Juan in a long
running television serial) suddenly appearing in Luis Bunuel's surreal
scourges of the bourgeoisie, financing and starring in the anarchic Themroc (1973), or eating himself to death in La Grande Bouffe (1973, Blow-Out)
In fact, the signs of his breaking out of the
'reasonable' mould had been there long before:
witness his work for Jean-Luc Godard in Le
Mepris (1963, Contempt) in which he plays a
writer paid to do a re-hash of 'The Odyssey' for
a megalomaniac producer. The only advice
Godard gave him has since become famous:
And it is some measure of Piccoli's capabilities that
not only does he embody that minimal direction perfectly, he also suggests an abrasiveness
and hurt quite at odds with his recognized
'image' of that time.
Piccoli can certainly appear to be as
withdrawn and insulated as the nameless
participants in Resnais' L'Annee Derniere a
Marienbad (1961, Last Year in Marienbad), but it clearly does not spring grom any emotional indifference. As Contempt demonstrated, his awareness of the social pressures bearing down on him, theprostitution of his talents and his
wife's contempt for him are almost too strong to allow his character any impassioned response. Yet it was Piccoli's urbanity that continued to appeal to his countrymen. Les Choses de la Vie (1970, The Things of Life) is a
typical example of the middle-of-the-road commercial ventures in which Piccoli involved himself too often to enable his homeground audiences to appreciate his more outlandish talents. The Things of Life gave him the role of another comfortable, suave womanizer, yet
there are still moments that he made his own: a finicky taste in shirts - they had to be a certain shade of blue, a certain cut of collar - betrayed an appealing fastidiousness,
a quality that film critic David Thomson pinned down with:
It markedly resurfaces, albeit in different mood, in Blow Out
when he expands at length on the wonders of rubber gloves!
Indeed, Blow Out might be regarded as the pivot of his career, the moment when he finally alienated his French audience and appeared to
the rest of the world as 'himself': scabrous but charming, immersed in - but subtly distanced from - the outrages of his surroundings. A man who could regard with perfect equanimity both the surreal fetishism of those rubber gloves and the proposition of eating
himself to death,
Blow Out is in many ways a mirror image of
Bunuel's El Angel Exterminador (1962, The Exterminating Angel), where a party of house
guests find themselves locked in a room without anything to eat. In Blow Out the director Marco Ferreri inverts Bunuel's world into a crueller version
in which four men willingly withdraw from everyday life and commit group suicide in an orgy of gluttony. Whether continuing his ballet practice, flexing himself sedately
at the wall bars or finally exploding on
the verandah, Piccoli continues to convey the same slightly removed intelluality that is
perfectly suited to Ferreri's brand of Surrealism. By keeping his sceptical distance he also invites the audience to view the bizarre nature of ordinary objects or the cruelty of human appetites.
It is this quality that so enhances Ferreri's
earlier Dillinger e Morto (1969, Dillinger Is
Dead). Cinematically, the film achieves a tranquil perfection in terms of formal composition, but it is Piccoli's quiet concentration that
makes it one of the most purely reflective films
ever made. He roams the house, alone and
silent; whether caressing the images that a
projector throws on a wall, making a salad or
dismantling an old revolver, he judges to
perfection the distance between the spiritual
needs of humans and the oppressive weight of
the world of objects.
Similarly, the achievement of a man taking apart his life and striking out for freedom reaches a peak of anarchic enthusiasm in Themroc, a film financed by Piccoli and in which he unusually appears as a fully paid-up member of the working class. Throwing over his oppressive family and job, he reverts to a state of nature - knocking down the walls of his flat, sleeping with his sister and eating policeman. The cry of anger from this modern caveman revealed a rare side of Piccoli; a sheer physicality rarely glimpsed since.
Given his usual air of detachment, it is perhaps strange that he has not worked more with Claude Chabrol, the most sardonic observer of the French bourgeoisie, His role in Les Noces Rouges (1973, Red Wedding) personified the small-town urges of the petit bourgeois, but the best-remembered sequence - his seduction of Stephane Audran in the local museum - has distinct overtones of Surrealism.
It is the sort of touch that Bunuel has made his own and which certainly underlines Piccoli's presence in both Le Charme Discret de la Bourgeoisie (1972, The Discreet Charm of the Bourgeoisie) and La Fantome de la liberte (1974, The Phantom of Liberty). Indeed, Bunuel's famous three-quarter-length shots seem ideally suited to capture Piccoli's talents: the imposing physical presence, broad chest, thick neck and leonine head can all be contained in the frame. The emotional intimacy of the close-up is rarely demanded, and the characters' ironic detachment underlines the bizarre aspects of any surrounding world.
|
|
|
Page created by: ihuppert5@aol.com Changes last made: 2015 | ||