![]() michael powell (1905-1990)
biography
49th parallel
richard attenborough
michael balcon
charlie chaplin
|
pressburger
"We decided to go ahead with David O. Selznick the way hedgehogs make love: verrry carefully!"
Michael Powell was the most extreme and the
most elusive director in the English cinema. He
may have been the best, if you are prepared for the best
to be so unsettling. Yes, Hitchcock was English
too, but two-thirds of his work was produced in
America, and he treated the English facetiously; in his films, ridiculous British manners
veil an indifference to everyday experience.
Powell was less devious and more rooted than
Hitchcock, less nerve-racking but more
troubled. His Englishness was a matter of imaginative ecstasy or pain living inside grim
composure and common sense. Powell stayed
in England and eventually languished because
of his loyalty. Hitchcock was even knighted, rewarded for a commercial astuteness that
Powell had been too proud or too reckless to
maintain.
Powell was born in 1905 near Canterbury, the
site of one of his strangest films, A Canterbury Tale (1944). It is a parable about materialism
and idealism, with Eric Portman as a classic Powell spokesman: abrasive, lofty toward
women, but a spire of cold purpose. As a young
man, Powell was rescued - from a routine job
in a bank - by the hotel his father owned at Cap
Ferrat, near Nice. While working there, he fell
in with the director Rex Ingram at the Victorine studio. Ingram, an outcast genius from
Hollywood, worked in France and North
Africa on movies that sweltered with his love of
artifice, with Islamic atmosphere and the
influence of Aleister Crowley, the model for
The Magician (1926), in which Powell had a
small comedy part.
The heady example of Ingram and the blaze
of the Mediterranean never deserted Powell in
the austerity of Britain in the Thirties. He
worked during that decade as a director of
quickies, none of which won special attention.
Yet he was learning his craft and resisting the
creed of documentary that John Grierson had
spread through British pictures. In 1937, like a
Grierson disciple, he went to the Northern Isles
to make The Edge of the World, but he returned
with a Celtic myth, not a study of damp
fishermen. It was the war that further enflamed Powell's imagination and brought him
his vital collaborator, Emeric Pressburger.
They worked together until 1956, usually
sharing credit for writing, direction and prouction. Pressburger remained a resident in England and the pair remained friends. Their separation
was no reflection on a partnership that seems
to have been a blessing to two very talented
but independent men.
The war revitalized British movies. The Minstry of Information 'advised' on scripts and
engineered films to back the war effort. Powell
began full of team spirit. but it testifies to
Britain's quixotic sense of propaganda that his
war movies are so equivocal. In 49th Parallel
(1941), a German submarine is wrecked on the
Canadian shore. Its survivors roam the land,
Confronting a series of Allied attitudes to the
war. Eric Portman was the German captain:
brutal, efficient, and animated by his cause, a
villain but a figure of heroic will.
Far more satisfying as a film, and far more
vexing to Winston Churchill, was The Life and
Death of Colonel Blimp (1943). Blimp was a
cartoon character, the embodiment of crusty
reaction in the British military, created by
David Low. Churchill was mortified that a
British film might perpetuate this satirical
portrait during hostilities. But Powell and
Pressburger adore their Blimp - Clive Candy
(Roger Livesey) - and showed him in three
different periods: 1902, 1914 and 1942. He is
not the brightest man, and he is certainly not
as ruthless as Portman's captain in 49th Parallel. But he has all those aspects of Englishness cherished by Powell: Tory values, a stiff
upper lip, and a fond heart. Moreover, Candy
has a German friend (Anton Walbrook), and
there is the haunting allure of a woman who
appears in all three episodes. As played by
Deborah Kerr she is the natural but impossible
love object for all Powell
Blimp was outrageously original and a
heartfelt statement against the wartime stress
on realism and obedience. Powell's films
around 1945 were equally personal reactions
against the new socialist tide in Britain.
Although I Know Where I'm Going (1945) and A
Matter of Life and Death 1946) are love stories,
they are also political statements wilfully set
against the grain of the time. Their unruliness
shows the difficulty Powell had in being a
man for his own time: but their spirit proclaims his loyalty to gentlemanly values, values
buried in his sense of English tradition. Thus
they look better as time passes, their strangeness turning into a poetry such as the silent
screen understood.
The post-war love stories depict desire lurking
within a restraining code, the lovers tossed
about between common sense and irrational
lyricism. Women are nuisances, helpmates or
familiars who intuit the power of spell and
fantasy. The films move violently yet serenely
from reality to hallucination. A
Matter of Life and Death has a bomber pilot 'killed' in action.
But he claims a reprieve in heaven because he
fell in love with a radio operator just before
dying. Reality is given gorgeous colour, and
the socialist Utopia of heaven is insipid black-
and-white. Although David Niven as the pilot
is chatty and matter-of-fact, he is a poet too. He
lands on a beach that looks like a Magritte
painting, and the film is without rival in British
cinema for its evocation of the eerie calm of
Surrealism. Though it ends happily, it has
unnerving moments in which it hovers on the
edge of order and chaos. It was also the first
evidence of Powell's characteristic Chinese-box structure, in which some actions are the
shadows of others - the trial in heaven being a
version of an operation on the pilot's brain.
Peace probably frustrated Powell. Instead of a splurge of joy and release in Britain, there were ration books and shortages. He responded with the exotic Black Narcissus (1947), made in a studio re-creation of Nepal, about the thunder of denied sexuality in a convent. It was picturesque, fevered and half-crazy: Gothic romance often beckoned Powell. The sensual potential of David Farrar, Deborah Kerr, Kathleen Byron and the young Jean Simmons is viewed with flinching ectasy, as if the film had been made by a hysterically abstinent nun.
David Farrar and Kathleen Byron play the couple in The Small Back Room (1949). He is a crippled, alcoholic bomb expert. His tin foot is ridiculed by a new German weapon he must learn to dismantle and by the giant whisky bottle he wrestles with in a dream sequence. Farrar - a dark, Gary Cooper-like actor, apparently too moody to seize the stardom that Powell believed would await him - is an ideal Powell hero: passionate but introverted. The Small Back Room is a remarkable film noir love story. Sexual longing hides in every shadow, as if hoping to refute the loneliness implicit in the title.
The Red Shoes (1948), on the other hand, is an explosion of colour - garish, undried, and vibrant with the feeling that is bitten back in the story and the playing. Revered by ballet lovers, The Red Shoes was the demonstration of Powell's craze for total cinema - colour, story, design, music, dance.
If anyone ever bought dancing shoes because of the film, that's fine. It seems more impressive for its relentless artiness, for its cinematic equivalent of the Andersen fairytale and its raptures with art. The Red Shoes captivates young people because its zeal is so close to nightmare: the ballerina cannot stop dancing, and the impresario urges her to perform at the cost of her life and the love he cannot even admit. The Red Shoes is theatrical and fanciful, but Anton Walbrook's rendering of the Diaghilev figure reflects Powell's conception of the artist as outcast, scold, and prophet to an indolent world. The artist's dedication is close to destructiveness: his vision is never more romantic than when it refuses to yield to real obstacles; he is most tender and wounded when he cannot share the sentiments of other people. For all its rainbow dazzle, The Red Shoes glorifies the pained but magnificient isolation of the artist.
Which brings us finally to Peeping Tom, a film that received violent abuse and loathing, and virtually ended Powell's British career. Peeping Tom is more naked than The Red Shoes because the ectasy it depicts is so damaging, yet fired by the same desperate search for a perfection that might redeem the mess of life. The hero is a young man, 'taught' terror by his father (played by Powell himself), whose voueuristic compulsion is in filming the dying spasms of the young woman he has murdered. Mark Lewis (Carl Boehm) works in the film industry as a focus-puller, but by night he is a deadly auteur, alone and in command. Powell never condemned the 'sick' young man: that's what repelled audiences in 1960. Further, he admitted later that he sympathized with him and with the way he represented all film directors in their creation of a seen world that surpasses all reality.
In Susan Sontag's words, Peeping Tom deals with 'the central fantasy connected with the camera' - that seeing is more potent than participating. As the reflection on a career, it enacts Powell's rueful belief in the need to sacrifice life to art. Peeping Tom is a tribute to the artist as self-destructive terrorist.
He was "re-discovered" in the late 1960's & after Francis Ford Coppola and Martin Scorsese tried to set up joint projects with him. In 1980, he lectured at Dartmouth College, New Hampshire. He was Senior Director in Residence at Zoetrope studio in 1981. In the last years of his life, Powell and Scorsese became soulmates, and Powell married Scorsese's longtime film editor Thelma Schoonmaker, 35 years his junior. It was his third marriage. His autobiography, A Life in Movies, was published in 1987.
He died of cancer back in his beloved England in 1990.
![]()
1930
1931
1932
1933
1934
1935
1936
1937
1939
1940
1941
1942
1943
1944
1945
1946
1947
1948
1949
1950
1951
1952
1955
1956
1957
1959
1960
1961
1962
1963
1964
1966
1969
1972
1978
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Page created by: ihuppert5@aol.com Changes last made: 2014 |